Blogodak - srpski blogovi na jednom mestu

Mass animal deaths across the globe

U.S. officials are looking into why more than 5,000 blackbirds crashed from the sky in Arkansas on the final day of 2010. In scenes reminiscent of the FlashForward drama series, state wildlife employees were searching the town of Beebe after scores of birds fell to the ground late on New Year's Eve, continuing into the early hours of the morning. Arkansas Game & Fish is trying to figure out why 100,000 fish in Northwest Arkansas turned up dead. They were found along a 20-mile stretch between the Ozark Dam and Highway 109 Bridge in Franklin County. Two million dead fish were found to have washed up on shores in Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. The alarming find is being blamed by authorities in Maryland on the stress caused by unusually cold water and overbreeding among spot fish. 40,000 crabs join slew of animal-death mysteries: more than 40,000 Velvet swimming crabs have wound up dead on England beaches. The possible reason? Hypothermia. The Thanet shoreline is littered with the crabs, along with dead starfish, lobsters, sponges and anemones. 8,000 turtle doves fall dead in Italy with strange blue stain on their beak. Thousands of dead turtle doves rained down on roofs and cars in an Italian town of Faenza. Residents in Faenza described the birds falling to the ground like 'little Christmas balls' with strange blue stains on their beaks. Fishermen and harbour chiefs are puzzled after millions of dead sardines were found floating in a marina just south of Los Angeles. Experts said the fish, found at a harbour in Redondo Beach, may have died from lack of oxygen due to algae, while locals wondered if high winds overnight might have had something to do with it. After hearing all the fairy tales (heart attacks from fireworks, bad weather, etc) about what could be causing this mass die-off of animal like, let's turn our attention to something that's not a fairytale, and certainly has the power and ability to be wreaking all this havoc.

The controversial military program based on Tesla technology. In a remote region of Alaska, a special government research center is said to be testing the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, which, some believe, allows radio waves to be developed as a potential weapon. If true, these radio waves could be used to change the weather and control people's minds. A scientific research facility, located near Gakona, in the remote Alaskan outback is a joint Navy and Air Force project. This facility is used to study the earth's Ionosphere, the electrically-charged belt surrounding our planet's upper atmosphere, ranging between 40 to 60 miles from its surface. More specifically, H.A.A.R.P. is a controversial high frequency radio transmitter, or "ionospheric heater". The military intends to use this billion-watt pulsed radio beam in our upper atmosphere, which will create extremely low frequency waves, or ELF waves. "This technology will enhance communications with submarines and will allow us to "see" into the Earth, detecting anything from oil reserves to hidden underground military targets."

At the haarp official website they will tell you that "in the end, the goal of all the research conducted at HAARP is knowledge. Knowledge is the fuel that powers our modern technological society. While many of the potential applications of this research can be foreseen, history tells us that many new and highly significant benefits will also emerge." HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP's main objective is to "exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes." Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of "induced ionospheric modifications" as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.

BY Michel Chossudovsky

The important debate on global warming under UN auspices provides but a partial picture of climate change; in addition to the devastating impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the ozone layer, the World's climate can now bemodified as part of a new generation of sophisticated "non-lethal weapons." Both the Americans and the Russians have developed capabilities to manipulate the World's climate. In the US, the technology is being perfected under the High-frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) as part of the ("Star Wars") Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI). Recent scientific evidence suggests that HAARP is fully operational and has the ability of potentially triggering floods, droughts, hurricanes and earthquakes.

From a military standpoint, HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction. Potentially, it constitutes an instrument of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions. World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that "US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods includethe enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth's atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods."

"Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised... Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. " Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen this in his book "Between Two Ages"

The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska-jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy-is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory's Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating "controlled local modifications of the ionosphere". Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich-actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP-describes HAARP as: "A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere (upper layer of the atmosphere) by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything-living and dead." Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as "a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet." It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature. The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer. In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses: "HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays. Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people's brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out. More generally, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World's electro-magnetic field. It is part of an arsenal of "electronic weapons" which US military researchers consider a "gentler and kinder warfare". HAARP is part of the weapons arsenal of the New World Order under the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). From military command points in the US, entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. More importantly, the latter can be implemented without the knowledge of the enemy, at minimal cost and without engaging military personnel and equipment as in a conventional war.
In February 1998, responding to a report of Mrs. Maj. Britt Theorin-Swedish MEP and longtime peace advocate--, the European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defense Policy held public hearings in Brussels on the HAARP program. The Committee's "Motion for Resolution" submitted to the European Parliament: "Considers HAARP by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body". The Committee's request to draw up a "Green Paper" on "the environmental impacts of military activities", however, was casually dismissed on the grounds that the European Commission lacks the required jurisdiction to delve into "the links between environment and defense".

"States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the responsibility to ensure that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment of other States or of areas beyond the limits of national jurisdiction." According to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) signed at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an "unfriendly nation" or "rogue state" with a view to destabilizing its national economy.

Is it HAARP?

Before the Niigata earthquake, just as before the China and Chile quakes, strange aurora-like lights were seen in the sky, lights that HAARP experts have confirmed are caused by electromagnetic disturbance coming down from the ionosphere. Were Haiti and Chile test run demonstrations for others? Following a week of electromagnetic silence, HAARP was turned on at approximately 0:00 hours 9 March, 2011 UTC and has been going strong since. HAARP or not, the Japanese economy has now been effectively destroyed and "Mother Nature" is to blame. Then, on May 19 2011 during the NATO operation "Libyan freedom and flowers for all" or whatever, an 8,4 magnitude earthquake hits Libya and you won't find it in the NEWS. (?!?) Two different European earthquake monitoring sites reported an 8.4 earthquake deep inside the Libyan desert about 30 miles southeast of Sinawin on May 19. The epicenter was approximately 120 miles south of the Mediterranean coast and roughly 200 miles southwest of Tripoli. Oddly, this earthquake was censored later. It was on all the sites, now it's all gone, didn't see anything on the news, no media coverage at all. Why? We've seen nothing yet...

Subscribe in a reader

Higashi Nihon Daishinsai
Friday, 11 March 2011

The earthquake came first, but it was not like all of the other earthquakes they had known. The ground shook so violently, for so long that afternoon on March 11, 2011, the earth liquefying in many places. The destruction of the magnitude 9.0 earthquake was unimaginable, but the wall of water was next...

9.0 magnitude undersea megathrust earthquake triggered extremely destructive tsunami waves of up to 37.9 meters (124 ft) that struck Japan minutes after the quake, in some cases traveling up to 10 km (6 mi) inland. The quake has moved portions of northeast Japan by as much as 2.4 m (7.9 ft) closer to North America and shifted the Earth's axis by 25 cm (9.8 in). This deviation led to a number of small planetary changes, including the length of a day and the tilt of the Earth. The speed of the Earth's rotation increased, shortening the day by 1.8 microseconds due to the redistribution of Earth's mass. The degree and extent of damage caused by the earthquake and resulting tsunami were enormous, with most of the damage being caused by the tsunami. 13,498 deaths has been confirmed, 4,916 injured and 14,734 people missing. 45,700 buildings were destroyed, earthquake and tsunami created an estimated 25 million tons of rubble and debris in Japan... But it wasn't over, yet.


Nuclear disaster



Japan declared a state of emergency following the failure of the cooling system at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, resulting in the evacuation of nearby residents. Officials from the Japanese Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency reported that radiation levels inside the plant were up to 1,000 times normal levels. It was reported that radioactive iodine was detected in the tap water in Fukushima, Tochigi, Gunma, Tokyo, Chiba, Saitama, and Niigata, and radioactive cesium in the tap water in Fukushima, Tochigi and Gunma. Radioactive cesium, iodine, and strontium were also detected in the soil in some places in Fukushima. Food products were also found contaminated by radioactive matter in several places in Japan. On April 5, 2011, the government of the Ibaraki Prefecture banned the fishing of the sand lance after discovering that this species was contaminated by radioactive cesium above legal limits. Some 45 per cent of 1,080 children under 15 from the Japanese Fukushima Prefecture have tested positive for thyroid exposure to radiation, a nuclear watchdog report says. Earlier, a Japanese civic group and Acro, a French body that measures radioactivity, reported that they had tested ten residents of Fukushima City aged between six and 16. All of them had trace amounts of radioactive substances in their urine. Thousands of Japanese recently took to the streets of Tokyo to protest against nuclear energy. In a culture that is generally non-confrontational and obedient, it is a serious sign of discontent. Some believe it is too early to tell what the real dangers of this situation are. Scientists know that large doses of radiation given in one blast is a significant health threat, but they say there is not enough information about long-term exposure to lower doses of radiation and the types of damage it can do. Now in the wake of an international crisis, there are allegations that the government and the power companies have worked out a deal to help each other, and that the media has been bought off.

“The first thing the government should do is let the citizens know the real cost of nuclear energy. Until now the priority has been to profit from energy. The PR machine of the government has been emphasizing the benefit of nuclear energy and the citizens have been brainwashed to believe in it,” ecological economist Yoshihiko Wada said.

For months the Japanese government has attempted to bury its head in the sand and try to ignore the severe levels of radiation being emitted into the air and sea. The Japanese government have attempted to ignore how serious the meltdowns have been, but the thruth is that Fukushima is the biggest industrial catastrophe in the history of mankind. There are twenty nuclear cores exposed with the potential to release twenty times the radiation of the Chernobyl disaster. Fukushima is going to dwarf Chernobyl. Chernobyl was different — a critical reactor exploded and stopped the reaction. At Fukushima, the reactor cores are still melting down. The Japanese government has had a level 7 nuclear disaster going for almost a week but won’t admit it. What Fukushima's triple meltdown means? Here is the information they don't want you to know. The highest levels of radiation were released into the atmosphere in the early days, when at least two and possibly three hydrogen explosions, the result of the building up of heat and steam inside the cores, occurred in the reactor buildings, releasing radioactive material into the atmosphere. When the nuclear plant entered its state of emergency, the fuel rods inside these reactors began to melt from their upright position and slump down to the bottom of their containers, or pressure vessels, which are designed to keep them sealed up and isolated. That's a problem because the nuclear fuel in a state of meltdown can, in the worst-case scenario, burn through its container and the plant infrastructure to leak into the ground around the facility. Fukushima is not far off the water table. When that molten mass of self-sustaining nuclear material gets to the water table it won’t simply cool down, it will explode. The Japanese are still talking about days or weeks to clean this up. That’s not true. They cannot clean it up. And no one will live in that area again for dozens or maybe hundreds of years.

The history of nuclear energy goes back more than half of a century, to when the first experimental reactors were built in the 1950s. The technology of nuclear energy production is still new. There were "several bumps" in its development, including the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine in 1986 and this year’s accident at Fukushima Daiichi in Japan.


50 heroes of Fukushima

Over 20 workers had been injured by 18 March, including one who was exposed to a large amount of radiation when the worker tried to vent vapour from a valve of the containment building. 3 more workers were exposed to radiation over 100 mSv, and 2 of them were sent to a hospital due to beta burns on 24 March. Two other workers, Kazuhiko Kokubo, 24, and Yoshiki Terashima, 21, were killed by the tsunami while conducting emergency repairs immediately after the quake. Their bodies were found on March 30. Fukushima 50 is the alias given by the media to a group of employees of the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant who stayed after TEPCO management proposed withdrawing all its employees from the plant on 14 March... The following night hundreds joined the original Fukushima 50. The workers and volunteers were assigned the mission of stabilizing the reactors. Their activities included assessing the damage and radiation levels caused by the explosions, cooling stricken reactors with seawater and preventing any risk of fire. These workers remained on-site despite risks of radiation poisoning. The Fukushima 50 were present when an explosion and fire occurred at the Unit 4 reactor.


Amid destroyed homes and rotting debris, survivors of Japan's earthquake and tsunami are stoically trying to keep their lives together, while fresh health fears surface over radiation. Victims still queue for basic necessities, nearly four months after the disaster struck.

“I want to tell people we need more help, more supplies and things are still bad here,” says a volunteer worker from Tokyo.



satellite photos before and after


globalgiving - japan earthquake relief fund


japan society relief fund





countdown to megaquakeSubscribe in a reader

Project MK-ULTRA, or MKULTRA, was the code name for a covert CIA mind-control and chemical interrogation research program, run by the Office of Scientific Intelligence. The program began in the early 1950s, continuing at least through the late 1960s, and it used United States citizens as its test subjects. The published evidence indicates that Project MK-ULTRA involved the surreptitious use of many types of drugs, as well as other methods, to manipulate individual mental states and to alter brain function. Although the CIA insists that MK-ULTRA-type experiments have been abandoned, 14-year CIA veteran Victor Marchetti has stated in various interviews that the CIA routinely conducts disinformation campaigns and that CIA mind control research continued. In a 1977 interview, Marchetti specifically called the CIA claim that MK-ULTRA was abandoned a “cover story.” An outgrowth of that project is unofficially referred to as “Project Monarch”. It is a mind control technique which exposes the subject to a trauma so violent that his/her mind creates a dissociation. The victim’s brain becomes compartmentalized and a new personality, which is then molded and educated by the manipulators, emerges. What we must retain here is the symbolism Monarch project engendered and its use in mass media. Monarch is a type of butterfly and became the ultimate “insider’s”symbol of mind control.

Lady Gaga incorporates in her videos, photos and shows symbolism that refers to the Illuminati and mind control. Her symbolism is deep, esoteric and even spiritual yet she makes song like “Just Dance” which is about being totally numb. This paradoxical aspect of Lady Gaga is something that deserves to be analyzed and understood. While masses of young people imitate Gaga’s gestures, her act is part of a bigger system that incorporates many other stars with the same symbolism. She is creative and a gifted song writer. But at the end of the day, the “Lady Gaga” persona is a Fame Monster, doing everything required to be an international superstar, including incorporating in her act the symbolism of the elite, making her an Illuminati puppet.

Symbolism surrounding Lady Gaga, in her pictures and videos, mixes those symbols with occultism of secret societies. Her vacuous, robotic and slightly degenerate persona embodies all the “symptoms” of a mind control victim. Let’s look at what Lady Gaga represents, starting by the basics: her name. Gaga is a term that immediately refers to absent mindedness. “Gaga” is probably the easiest word to say in the English language, as it is often the first sound emitted by babies trying to imitate speech. So her name basically says: I’m a lady and I’m empty-headed. This empty head can filled with any crap you want. Imitate me young people. This state of mind is achieved after successful mind control. Her name is also said to be inspired by Queen’s song “Radio Gaga”. The video of this song contains many scenes of the 1927 movie Metropolis. The motion picture tells the story of a woman from the working class that was chosen by the elite to give life to a robot, through a mix of science and Black magic. This robot becomes a sexy and alluring performer and is given the goal to corrupt the working class. References to this movie abound in music videos, as if it was very significant for the occult elite. Madonna, Beyonce, Kylie Minogue and many others have taken the likeness of this female robot and, as you’ll see in the “Paparazzi” video, Lady Gaga also continues this “tradition”. Her logo is pretty revealing and particularly fitting. Its a headless female body with a bolt of lightning going through her and exiting her genitalia. There is once again a focus on the lack of conscious thought by the singer. The body looks like the weird headless mannequins you find at clothing stores. The bolt of lightning implies that her thoughtless body has been “charged” with a force that gives it life (interesting note: trauma-based mind control is often induced using electro-shock treatments). You only need to look at a couple of Lady Gaga pictures or videos to notice that she is constantly hiding one of her eyes. Most people will simply interpret this as ”a cool thing to do” or a “fashion statement”. Those who have passed the 101 of Illuminati symbolism know that the All-Seeing Eye is probably its most recognizable symbol. The gesture of hiding one eye, usually the left one, goes way back in occult orders. Here’s an explanation of the origin of the Eye of Horus. Horus, the sun of Osiris and Isis was called ‘Horus who rules with two eyes’. His right eye was white and represented the sun: his left eye was black and represented the moon. According to the myth, Horus lost his left eye to his evil brother, Seth, who he fought to avenge Seth’s murder of Osiris. Seth tore out of the eye but lost the fight. The eye was reassembled by magic, by Thoth, the god of writing, the moon and magic. Horus presented his eye to Osiris, who experienced rebirth in the underworld. Her videos: Almost all of Lady Gaga’s videos contain occult symbolism and not-so-subtle hints referring to mind control. We’ll first look at a short video used as an intro during her tour. Lady G is talking in a vaporous and robotic way, as if she was lobotomized, about a man who “swallowed her brain”. Gaga is questioned by a man who is talking in a very strange and hypnotic matter. If this is not about mind control, I have no idea what its about. /source

Paparazzi video:
It basically describes the fall and rise to the top of Lady Gaga, who, during the process, went through a huge metamorphosis. Lady is in a bedroom with her boyfriend and they’re “getting it on”. Notice the Masonic checkerboard pattern on the wall and a ram’s head, representing Baphomet. He takes her outside on the balcony (which also features a checkerboard pattern). After noticing cameras taking pictures, the guy starts acting strangely and things get violent. He finally pushes Lady off the balcony. While falling down, the background becomes a swirling pattern, typically associated with hypnotism. Lady Gaga falls down rather stylishly, hinting the fact that this descent is not physical. It represents the “trauma” victims of mind control have to go through in order to be “rebuilt from scratch”. Lady Gaga then enters a mansion in a wheel chair and gradually takes off her clothes. She slowly starts walking, with the help of crutches, representing her reeducation by the occult elite (she is inside a mansion). She is dressed like a robot, hinting Maria from the movie Metropolis. Another scene shows her dancing in a half white/half black wedding dress. This signifies her (forced) association with the “dark Brotherhood”. Her transformation is then complete. We then see her next to the boyfriend that pushed her off the balcony. She is wearing Mickey Mouse clothes, hinting once again Monarch programming. She is behaving in a very robotic way, as if her thoughts and actions were controlled by someone else. Gaga then proceeds to poison the guy and smiles very weirdly about it. The fact that she murdered her boyfriend refers to the level “Delta” of the Monarch project, which is also known as the “killer” programming. Here’s a description of it:
DELTA. This is known as “killer” programming, originally developed for training special agents or elite soldiers (i.e. Delta Force, First Earth Battalion, Mossad, etc.) in covert operations. Optimal adrenal output and controlled aggression is evident. Subjects are devoid of fear; very systematic in carrying out their assignment. Self-destruct or suicide instructions are layered in at this level.-(Dr. Corydon Hammond, Project Monarch Programming Definitions). After carrying out her murderous mission, Lady Gaga is more popular than ever and reaps the rewards of being an Illuminati slave...

Born This Way video:
The introduction basically involves around G.O.A.T (which stands for Government Owned Alien Territory) and the ‘declaration’ of the Manifesto of Mother Monster. Mother Monster basically envisioned a world where no prejudice exists (and beings with pointy shoulders). We’re given the Mother Monster Manifesto, which is really sort of a long-winded, gorgeously styled way of saying “In the future, we will all look the same, have pointy shoulders and love each other without prejudice.” And so, as the Eternal Mother gives birth to The New Race from above, so too does Evil spring forth from the womb of the underworld. Mother Monster gives birth to a race who are ‘good’ (for a lack of a better term). However, the evil race also gets born in the process. This leads GaGa to say “How can I protect something so perfect without evil?” So the dancing sequence begins... Some scenes do not actually provide continuity to the plot. Rather, aesthetics seem to be the name of the game especially in the scenes with the skeleton duo that resemble Zombie Boy. The final scene with the white gloves and that lone tear while facing the camera which eventually leads to people seeing the gap-toothed version of GaGa. These two elements in the final moments of the plot obviously reference the late King of Pop, Michael Jackson and the Queen of Pop who is Madonna. Discussion can go on and on whether GaGa is simply paying her respects to the two icons in Pop or declaring that she belongs with them.

Judas video:
(yes, we know Madonna did it too with "Like a Prayer") She's moving in a new direction from her bluffin' muffin,' Poker Face days: Gaga's going philosophical. And in her own words, "The cultural baptism cannot be stopped." Looks like Gaga's talking about herself here, and perhaps taking a deeper look into her role in this world using allusions she and quite a few others in this world know so well. The song and video are told from Mary Magdelene’s perspective, with lyrics such as, “When he comes to me, I am ready/ I’ll wash his feet with my hair if he needs/ Forgive him when his tongue lies through his brain/ Even after three times, he betrays me/ I’ll bring him down (Jesus), a king with no crown…” The demon that overtook Judas was said to be Satan himself. So the demon she cling to is not Judas but Satan. Lady Gaga is a vehicle for satanic propaganda, she is a mindless robot that carries a message, she sold her soul for fame. Her deep symbolic occult gestures are welcomed by the mindless masses and imitated because she is cool. Subscribe in a reader

Libya: NATO's War Of Aggression Against A Sovereign African State

By Obi Nwakanma

June 06, 2011 "Vanguard" -- France and Great Britain, leading a NATO alliance, are effectively at war in Libya on the pretext of a United Nations’ mandate. The United States, led the early charge against Libya’s Ghadaffi from the air, but has taken something of a back seat, and allowed Britain and France to continue what can now be considered a war of aggression against a sovereign African state, far beyond the mandate of the UN. They have been bombing Libya relentlessly from the air. They have killed Ghadaffi’s son in a direct personal attack on the home of the Ghadaffis. The relentless strafing of Tripoli, the Libyan capital, in the past two weeks has also led to serious civilian casualties which the Libyan authorities have reported and which NATO has denied. The NATO alliance at the fore of this new colonial war in Africa has now moved beyond its mandate to seek regime change; to undermine the sovereignty of Libya, and create a civil war situation in this North African country and member-nation of the African Union. The French have positioned their aggression against Libya as a fight to free Libyans from the tyranny of Moumar Ghadaffi. They have not hidden the fact that they wished to make it impossible for a transition of power from Ghadaffi to a newer generation of Libyan nationalists who may follow in the state policies of Ghadaffi, particularly as it affects oil. It is not a secret that Libya sits on the vastest oil field in Africa and that Ghadaffi has prevented the international oil cartel from exploiting Libya’s oil and had forced them to comply with the strictest standards in oil production. It is no longer a secret that behind this NATO alliance war on Libya, and far beyond the “do-good” face it places or wears as its mask as its reason for bombing Libya to smithereens, is the quest to control the oil fields of Libya, guarantee Western access to energy sources in the face of growing concern over the rise of China and India and their own emergent gluttony for oil, and, of course, solve the problem of an intransigent African nationalist challenge to Western shenanigans. It is the 19th century all over again. Libya is the first flashpoint in the resource war that is bound to once more make Africa the battlefield of the great industrial powers. Once they take out Ghadaffi, that challenge to organise and fund a formidable African resistance against a new colonial mandate using the UN will weaken. The new scramble for Africa will more than likely commence. It is, therefore, ridiculous that Nigeria, a more than likely victim of this potential threat sits idly, voting with those who have launched a new aggressive war on Libya. The Nigerian government under President Goodluck Jonathan has failed to understand the wider dimensions of this NATO campaign on Libya. The Nigerian delegation was among those African countries who sided with the voters in the UN to commence the operations in Libya. The mandate, of course, was for a low-grade, protective operation against the potential of the Libyan military use of force against civilian populations, particularly in Benghazi, the so-called outpost of the Libyan resistance. Last week, at the G-8 meeting in France, and, in justifying America’s participation in the fight in Libya, the US President Barack Obama said it was a pre-emptive action by the NATO alliance, presumably the world’s chief defenders of humane mores and democratic freedom, to prevent a possible massacre of wide proportions against the Libyan civilian opposition against Ghadaffi. But the Libyan opposition is not a civilian opposition, it is an armed rebellion. The UN decision in which Nigeria participated basically tied the hands of the legitimate government of Libya behind its back, gave ammunition to a fringe rebellion, and has aided a civil war in Libya in which Libya’s national Armed Forces was prevented through relentless air attack from defending the territorial integrity of the Libyan state for which it is established. The West has aided a small fissiparous and ill-organised militia to destroy an African country. It is like NATO deciding to bomb the Nigerian Armed Forces if it goes after the increasingly organised Boko Haram militia in the North. Nigeria has in voting with France and Great Britain and the NATO alliance given ammunition to the new conquest of Africa and this is why she is seen roundly in Africa and by most Africans as the handmaiden of the West. This image of Nigeria as a consistent ally of the West against the interests of a free, independent, and prosperous continent is why most Africans and African nations do not take Nigeria seriously, and even, in fact, are amused by its claims of leadership in Africa. They think her quest for the UN seat is a joke given the weakness of its leadership and the inconsistency of its foreign policy. But contrast this with the strategic position of the South Africans on this matter, leading the African union to demand an immediate NATO cessation of the bombing of Libya. Last week, Jacob Zuma, the South African President went to Tripoli for consultations with the Libyan authorities, and the African Union issued a demand for NATO to stop bombing Libya. It is a follow-up to AU’s earlier intervention in which they have proposed a negotiated settlement between Tripoli and Benghazi. But NATO countries, busy setting up new embassies, and cutting new oil deals with the Libyan rebels against the long-term interest of Libya, are fobbing off any attempts for the Africans to sort out the situation in Libya and ease off Ghadaffi with less sanguinity. It is remarkable that Nigeria’s own president has continued to play possum to this NATO disregard of the African Union. Indeed, within the week of Zuma’s visit to Tripoli, NATO announced heightened military action against Ghadaffi’s Libya, and the use of more direct boots on the Libyan streets. The use of Western troops in Africa – particularly in the case of France – the use of its paratroopers, first in Ivory Coast, and now in Libya, represents a new strategic declaration of war against Africa, the African interest, and the African continent. In NATO’s disregard of AU, there is without doubt a remanifestation of that ontological disease of the Western mind that regards Africa as simply a place without history and without agency. It is not surprising that Sarkozy is leading this war in Africa. Here was a man who came to Africa, at the Cheik Anta Diop University in Dakar to declare that “the African man has not entered history;” he is still a hewer of wood fit only for the enlightened charity of France and the West. At the core of Sarkozy’s racist mind lies this quest to cut Libya and Ghadaffi down to size and seize her property – the oil. But here is the irony: the West had to wait for a weakened Ghadaffi, weakened by his decision to dismantle his nuclear arsenal and open up to the West, before the NATO alliance in a joint and cowardly effort decided to attack him from the air using a UN mandate. What is the lesson here? Nigeria must be alert to its duties to the continent and join the AU effort to more forcefully demand NATO’s cessation of her bombing operations in Libya, failing which it must then regard further operations in Libya as an open act of war and aggression against an African country. Africans have a right to defend themselves and their continent by all means necessary. Perhaps, it is time to re-open the discussions about an African High Command.Subscribe in a reader

Basically, Project Bluebeam is designed to usher in the New World Order with a one world government, one world army, one world religion, a cashless society and micro-chipped populations controlled by a central computer. "The elite" of the world would not be subject to this fascist control system but would run it and enjoy its spoils. The collective plan is to create a gigantic space light show with accompanying electronically driven wave patterns. 3D optical holograms and sounds, laser projections of multiple holographic images. This show would make people believe God is talking to them. When the project is activated, a "Messiah" will appear in every country, representing that country's biggest religion. All religions will melt into one (the new world order religion). World's greatest hoax. Wernher von Braun warned of such a hoax, as a pretext for putting war in space. As Wernher von Braun related to Dr. Carol Rosin, his spokesperson for the last 4 years of his life, a maniacal machine - the military, industrial, intelligence, laboratory complex - would go from Cold War, to Rogue Nations, to Global Terrorism, to the ultimate last card: A hoaxed threat from space. At first that threat would be from asteroids, later from extraterrestrial attack. Something must be created to terrify the people and the media is then used as the perfect tool to brodcast the official version to them. This is using the "Problem-Reaction-Solution" formula, as David Icke would call it. Create the fake alien invasion, wait for the public to be scared and then offer the answer - a one world government and army. When the media has announced in mainstream news that the planet is being attacked by hostile aliens the solution will be martial law declared and the introduction of a one world government and army to fight this threat to humanity. The idea was actually once voiced by the late President Reagan when he spoke about a cause needed to unite the world and suggested that that threat might come from outer space. Did Reagan know all about Bluebeam? In the case of Project Bluebeam there are more than one theorised plan that may be put into operation. One of these is to stage an elaborate worldwide faked alien invasion with UFOs that will be seen in the sky. The other one is to create religious prophecied scenarios taking place like "fake second coming". An innovative technique for generating 3D holographic display using strontium barium niobate (SBN) exists today. Chemitrails, LRADs (Long Range Acoustic Device being used these days in Iraq: "devilish American weapon that makes people believe they are hearing voices in their head") and 3D holograms in the sky will play their role in fake second coming of Messiah...

PROJECT BLUE BEAM

By Serge Monast
Originally Published 1994 /short version

[Note: Serge Monast [1945 - December 5, 1996] and another journalist, both of whom were researching Project Blue Beam, died of "heart attacks" within weeks of each other although neither had a history of heart disease. Serge was in Canada. The other Canadian journalist was visiting Ireland. Prior to his death, the Canadian government abducted Serge's daughter in an attempt to dissuade him from pursuing his research into Project Blue Beam. His daughter was never returned. Pseudo-heart attacks are one of the alleged methods of death induced by Project Blue Beam.]

The infamous NASA [National Aeronautics and Space Administration] Blue Beam Project has four different steps in order to implement the new age religion with the Antichrist at its head. We must remember that the new age religion is the very foundation for the new world government, without which religion the dictatorship of the new world order is completely impossible.
Engineered Earthquakes & Hoaxed 'Discoveries'. The first step in the NASA Blue Beam Project concerns the breakdown [re-evaluation] of all archaeological knowledge. It deals with the set-up, with artificially created earthquakes at certain precise locations on the planet, of supposedly new discoveries which will finally explain to all people the "error" of all fundamental religious doctrines. The falsification of this information will be used to make all nations believe that their religious doctrines have been misunderstood for centuries and misinterpreted.
The Big Space Show in the Sky. The second step in the NASA Blue Beam Project involves a gigantic 'space show' with three-dimensional optical holograms and sounds, laser projection of multiple holographic images to different parts of the world, each receiving a different image according to predominating regional national religious faith. This new 'god's' voice will be speaking in all languages. The space show, the holographic images will be used in a simulation of the ending during which all nations will be shown scenes that will be the fulfillment of that which they desire to verify the prophecies and adversary events. These will be projected from satellites onto the sodium layer about 60 miles above the earth. The project has perfected the ability for some device [referred to as "tractor beams" by ufologists].to lift up an enormous number of people, as in a Rapture, and whisk the entire group into a never-never land. We see tests of this device in the abduction of humans by those mysterious little alien greys who snatch people out of their beds and through windows into waiting "mother ships." The calculated resistance to the universal religion and the new messiah and the ensuing holy wars will result in the loss of human life on a scale never imagined before in all of human history. In addition, this event will occur at a time of profound worldwide political anarchy and general tumult created by some worldwide catastrophe.
Artificial Thought & Communication. The advancement of techniques propel us toward the third step in the Blue Beam Project that goes along with the telepathic and electronically augmented two-way communication where ELF, VLF and LF waves will reach each person from within his or her own mind, convincing each of them that their own god is speaking to them from the very depths of their own soul. Government agencies and the corporations that work with them toward a new world order are prepared to promote anything that will help them achieve their objective of total social control. As for the question of why: For one thing, if you terrify the public and make them fear for their safety, they will allow you to implement draconian law enforcement practice, disarm them and keep extensive records on them, and they only have to tell you that it is all to protect you, of course. Secondly, it promotes the decay of the present democratic forms of political systems, and leads societies to search for alternative methods of political ideology. Of course, the alternative has already been planned. No one should now be allowed to have their own individual personality. Anyone with 'antisocial' behavior will be disposed of quickly so that other modified individuals will be able to fulfill the needs and agendas of the new world order without being distracted by the truth. Mind-control operations and technology include a transmitter that broadcasts at the same frequency as the human nervous-system, which transmitter is manufactured by the Loral Electro-Optical System in Pasadena, California. Loral, a major defense contractor, has previously conducted research on directed energy weapons for Lt. Gen. Leonard Perez of the U. S. Air Force who was searching for a weapon that could implant messages into the minds of the enemy while urging his own troops on to superhuman deeds of valor! The device employs electromagnetic radiation of gigahertz frequencies [microwaves] pulsed at extremely low frequencies (ELF). It is used to torture people both physically and mentally from a distance. The process employed by such ELF technology are described in various U. S. Defense Department publications, including one entitled, ' The Electromagnetic Spectrum and Low Intensity Conflict,' by Captain Paul E. Tyler, Medical Commandant, U. S. Navy, which is included in a collection entitled, 'Low Intensity Conflict and Modern Technology Edict,' by Lt. Col David G. Dean, USAF. The paper was delivered in 1984 and the collection published 1986 by Air University Press, Maxwell Airforce Base, Alabama. A 1978 book entitled, 'Microwave Auditory Effect and Application,' by James C. Lynn describes how audible voices can be broadcast directly into the brain. This technology could actually allow the blind to see and the deaf to hear. Instead, it has been turned into a weapon to enslave the world. Allen Frie also reports that he could speed up, slow down or stop the hearts of isolated frogs by synchronizing the pulsed rate of a microwave beam with the heart itself. According to Dr. Robert Becker, similar results have been obtained using live frogs, which shows that it is technically feasible to produce heart attacks with rays designed to penetrate the human chest. Now figure out when we hear that voice from the new world messiah who would be speaking from space to all of the sane people of the earth who might give instructions to zealots and religious fanatics, we would see hysteria and social mayhem on a scale never witnessed before on this planet.
Universal Supernatural Manifestations via Electronics. The fourth step concerns the universal supernatural manifestation with electronic means. It contains three different orientations. One is to make mankind believe that an alien (off-world) invasion is about to occur at every major city on earth in order to provoke each major nation to use its nuclear weapons in order to strike back. This way, the United Nations Court will require that all those nations which launched nuclear weapons to disarm when the invasion is shown to have been false. The second is to make the Christians believe that the Rapture is going to occur with the supposed divine intervention of an alien (off-world) civilization coming to rescue earthlings from a savage and merciless demon. Its goal will be to dispose of all significant opposition to the implementation of the New World Order in one major stroke, actually within hours of the beginning of the sky show! The third orientation in the fourth step is a mixture of electronic and supernatural forces. The waves used at that time will allow "supernatural forces" to travel through optical fibers, coaxial cables (TV) electrical and phone lines in order to penetrate to everyone at once through major appliances. Embedded chips will already be in place. The goal of this deals with global Satanic ghosts projected all around the world in order to push all populations to the edge of hysteria and madness, to drown them into a wave of suicide, murder and permanent psychological disorders. After the Night of the Thousand Stars, worldwide populations will be ready for the new messiah to re-establish order and peace at any cost, even at the cost of abdication of freedom.
A lot of people ask when this is going to happen and how they will accomplish the visions of the Night of a Thousand Stars, and the events that will point to the days when it will begin. According to the many reports we have received, we believe it will begin with some kind of worldwide economic disaster. Not a complete crash, but enough to allow them to introduce some kind of in-between currency before they introduce their electronic cash to replace all paper or plastic money. The in-between currency will be used to force anyone with savings to spend or turn in their cash because they understand that people who have money and are not dependent upon them might be the very ones who will mount an insurrection against them. If everyone is broke, no one can fund a war of any kind: paper currency will cease to exist. This is one of the first signs. The goal of a dictatorship is to control everyone, everywhere on the planet, ruthlessly and without exception. That's why the new technology being introduced everywhere is a technology for the control of the people.
/source/

videoSubscribe in a reader

"It will be over in 48 hours"

Just how many times did we hear that? Some people like to look into the name of the mission, Operation Odyssey Dawn, though those in charge of naming it say it was totally random. “There’s a group of planning officers led by a Lieutenant Colonel that in the early days of planning and looked at a list and decided to call it Odyssey basically because they liked the word odyssey,” said Eric Elliot, with US Africa Command. Still, some continue to find the title concerning. “It’s sort of an odd combination,” said Hayes Roth, Chief Marketing Officer for Landor Worldwide. “Odyssey implies that we’re on a long journey and dawn means we’re at the beginning of that long journey so in English, that’s a little worrisome.” And it’s not just the dictionary definition to be concerned about. Think about Homer’s epic, poem The Odyssey. In some ways, it’s a story about people wandering around the Mediterranean for ten years unable to find their way. The reports of Libya mobilizing its air force against its own people spread quickly around the world. However, Russia's military chiefs say they have been monitoring from space and the pictures tell a different story. According to Al Jazeera and BBC, on February 22 Libyan government inflicted airstrikes on Benghazi, the country's largest city and on the capital Tripoli. However, the Russian military, monitoring the unrest via satellite from the very beginning, says nothing of the sort was going on on the ground. At this point, the Russian military is saying that, as far as they are concerned, the attacks some media were reporting have never occurred. American officials said the military intervention has cost the Pentagon an extra $550 million so far, with bombs and missiles accounting for most. There are no official figures for the UK share of the cost, but at least £25 million will have been spent by British forces, most accounted for by weapons. The rebel forces trying to topple Gaddafi admittedly include more than 1,000 Al-Qaeda soldiers while enjoying total backing– weapons, planes, funding and forces– from the U.S., Britain, NATO and other allies. The CIA and British SAS forces that are now "officially" entering Libya as ground support were covertly operating at least a month ago. There are absolutely no "pro-democracy" fighters in Libya, especially in the East. Majority of the rebel forces are hard core Al-Qaeda, Darna is like world capital of terrorism, others are monarchists and islamic fundamentalists. If there was any doubt in the past that Al-Qaeda is CIA's secret army, today there is none. That's a fact. People trying to lead these unleashed gangs of mujahedeens are in fact former US POWs straight from Guantanamo. One key Libyan rebel leader (Khalifa Hifter) spent the last 20 years: inside the U.S., living just minutes away from Langley, Virginia, also known as home base to the CIA. It is insane. Do people in U.S. know this? No, they are brainwashed zombies. Mainstream propaganda does its job well. Another "bombs for peace" campaign, rrright..."Bombs for peace", that's like fucking for virginity. Just how legal is this war? Lord Ashdown, the former high representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, said the coalition forces led by Britain, France and the US were facing "a moment of danger" over the legality of their actions. He said "continued support for this looks as though it is leading to support for regime change, which legally is beyond the [United Nations] security council resolution". Legal experts said the international coalition may have overstepped what was agreed by the UN resolution sanctioning military action to "take all necessary measures ... to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack". Concern grew as Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister, said he believed the military action was now in breach of international law. "We consider that intervention by the coalition in what is essentially an internal civil war is not sanctioned by the UN security council resolution," he said. Russia abstained from the vote which resulted in resolution 1973. President Obama has told Congress, "U.S. military forces commenced operations" in Libya. Article I, section 8 of the United States Constitution states that "Congress shall have the power ... to declare war..." Since Congress has not declared war on Libya, is American involvement in the Libyan war unconstitutional? Some members of Congress think so. Presidential candidate Barack Obama agreed in 2007: "the President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation." Whatever else may be true about them, the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 were authorized by Congress. In the case of the Iraq war, there was a vigorous Congressional and public debate before the war took place. In this particular case, the decision of the Obama Administration to engage the country in a new Middle East war without Congressional authorization represents a long-term threat to the U.S. peace movement, because the U.S. peace movement is engaged in a long struggle to try to influence U.S. policy in the direction of less war, and Congress is a key arena in which the peace movement tries to assert influence over U.S. policy. And the precedent that has been set here, especially if Congress does not take affirmative action to reassert its war powers, is extremely dangerous. If President Obama can engage the country in a war in Libya with a "recess bombing" which has not been authorized by Congress, what's to stop a future President from doing the same thing in, let's say Iran?

The Libyan no-fly zone was established long ago; the focus is now on attacking Gaddafi's ground forces, enabling rebel advancements, and regime change. Libyan tanks, artillery and armoured vehicles do not fly. A mission that initially seemed to revolve around establishing a no-fly zone has become focused on halting advances by government ground forces in and around key coastal cities. Then there's the question of the legality of arming rebel troops. That would be a violation of the U.N. Resolution 1970 ("imposing an arms embargo on the country") and a breach of international law. More to the point, can it really be said that arming Libyan rebels is necessary for the protection of civilians? That sounds much more like what one does to help one side win a civil war. Arming the Libyan rebels will lay the foundation for new war 10 years from now. Maybe US are counting on that? The Turkish prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, accused France of seeing Libya as a source of 'oil, gold mines and underground treasures'. Using incendiary language directed at France in a speech in Istanbul, Erdogan said: "I wish that those who only see oil, gold mines and underground treasures when they look in Libya's direction, would see the region through glasses of conscience from now on." President Gül reinforced the Turkish view that France and others were being driven primarily by economic interests. "The aim [of the air campaign] is not the liberation of the Libyan people," he said. "There are hidden agendas and different interests." Earlier this week, Claude Guéant, the French interior minister who was previously Sarkozy's chief adviser, outraged the Muslim world by stating that the French president was "leading a crusade" to stop Gaddafi massacring Libyans. Gaddafi's son has claimed that Libya helped finance Nicolas Sarkozy's successful election campaign in 2007. Asked what he felt about the French president's so far unsuccessful efforts to muster support for military intervention, Saif said: "Sarkozy must first give back the money he took from Libya to finance his electoral campaign. We funded it. We have all the details and are ready to reveal everything. The first thing we want this clown to do is to give the money back to the Libyan people. He was given the assistance so he could help them, but he has disappointed us. Give us back our money." On August 30, 2008, Gaddafi and Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi signed a historic cooperation treaty in Benghazi. Under its terms, Italy would pay $5 billion to Libya as compensation for its former military occupation. Never happened. In exchange, Libya would take measures to combat illegal imigration coming from its shores and boost investments in Italian companies. Libya supplies almost a quarter of Italy’s oil, and Italy is the world’s largest importer of Libyan crude. Libya also owns 7.5 per cent of the Italian bank UniCredit and has investments in Fiat, the defense conglomerate Finmeccanica, the energy company ENI, the soccer team Juventus and a variety of other Italian businesses. Who is bombing Libya? Gaddafi's debtors united in a "coallition of the willing". This financial backing helped Italy stave off the most damaging effects of the global recession that started in 2008. It is interesting to note that in response to international pressure, Italy has only frozen some Libyan assets, but none belonging to the country’s central bank or the Libyan Investment Authority. However, Italy’s hardly the only cash-strapped European nation to forge significant economic ties with the Gaddafi regime. In 2009, the European Union’s two-way trading with Libya amounted to more than $37 billion, with Germany, France and Spain among its leading partners. Naturally, the bulk of this was petroleum because Libya supplies more than 10 per cent of Europe’s oil. For a sense of just how much that is, consider that the United States of America, which had just $2.6 billion in two-way trade with Libya in 2009 and imports virtually no petroleum from the country, gets roughly 10 per cent of its oil from Saudi Arabia. That’s what Europe is losing as Libya burns. Donald Trump, whose flirtations with a presidential bid continue, says he has special experience dealing with Libyan leader Moammer Gaddafi. Trump, who has said he will decide on a presidential bid by June this year, said he is particularly happy with the fact he "screwed" Gaddafi on a past real estate deal. "I rented him a piece of land. He paid me more for one night than the land was worth for two years, and then I didn't let him use the land," Trump boasted. "That's what we should be doing. I don't want to use the word 'screwed', but I screwed him." Good job, Mr Trump, put it in your CV. No Gaddafi, no debt... and maybe oil for free. The Gaddafi's family has a reputation for lavish parties attended by stars. Beyonce and Mariah Carey have performed in elaborate New Year’s Eve parties in the Carribean thrown by Gaddafi’s son, Mutassim, while 50 Cent performed in a private concert during the 2005 Venice Film festival. For each performance, the alleged fee is $2 million per-performer. Stars also get paid to simply attend parties. Following the brutal domestic conflict in Libya, stars who have performed for the Gaddafi family, have been expressing their "regret" by donating the money they gained from Gadaffi’s family to charity. Among the stars who have donated their money are Nelly Furtado, Beyonce, Mariah Carey and Usher. The latest star who followed their lead is rapper 50 Cent, who announced that he will donate to Unicef. The London School of Economics (LSE) says it will set up fund to support North African students with money donated by son of Libyan leader. In 2009, the university accepted £1.5 million from the International Charity and Development Foundation, which is chaired by the younger Gaddafi, who owns a $16 million mansion in London’s fashionable Hampstead Garden neighbourhood. The London School of Economics, which has come under heavy criticism for accepting a donation from a Gadaffi charity, is looking into accusations that Moammar Gaddafi’s second-oldest son and presumed political heir, 38-year-old Saif Islam, plagiarised parts of his doctoral thesis at LSE. His abandoned London home has been occupied by anti-Gaddafi protesters from throughout Britain. The cold reality is that with Libya descending into chaos, Europe is losing a major partner just when its key economies are struggling to regain their footing. Britain has recently emerged as a major target for Libyan investments. Libya has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on prime London commercial real estate and last year, a senior executive with the Libyan Investment Authority announced that the fund had earmarked $8 billion exclusively for Britain. So what were they thinking?

Life under "Gaddafi's dictatorship"

Just how bad was it? In the early 1980s, Libya was one of the wealthiest countries in the world; its GDP per capita was higher than that of developed countries such as Italy, Singapore, South Korea, Spain and New Zealand. The Libyan economy depends primarily upon revenues from the oil sector. Compared to its neighbors, Libya enjoys a low level of both absolute and relative poerty. Libyan officials in the past six years have carried out economic reforms as part of a broader campaign to reintegrate the country into the global capitalist economy. This effort picked up steam after UN sanctions were lifted in September 2003, and as Libya announced in December 2003 that it would abandon programmes to build weapons of mass destruction. Authorities have privatised more than 100 government owned companies since 2003 in industries including oil refining, tourism and real estate, of which 29 are 100% foreign owned. High oil revenues and a small population have allowed the Libyan state to provide an extensive level of social security, particularly in the fields of housing and education. Libyan social security legislation of 1973 ranked among the most comprehensive in the world and it protected all citizens from many hazards associated with employment. Workers employed by foreign firms were entitled to the same social security benefits as workers employed by Libyan citizens. Subsidized food, inexpensive housing, free medical care and education, and profit-sharing were among the benefits that eased the lives of all citizens. The government protected the employed in their jobs and subsidized the underemployed and unemployed. In addition, there were nurseries to care for the children of working mothers, orphanages for homeless children, and homes for the aged. I could live under such dictator. Before Odyssey Dawn, Libya was undergoing a business boom. Many government-run industries were being privatised. Many international oil companies have returned to the country, including oil giants Shell and Exxon Mobil. Tourism was on the rise. The United States removed Gaddafi's regime, after 27 years, from its list of states sponsoring terrorism. (Gaddafi decided to pay almost $3 billion in compensation to the families of Pan Am Flight 103 and UTA Flight 772.).

Subscribe in a reader

(photo above)Osama Bin Laden and Zbigniew Brzezinski: President Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski visiting 'his boy', Osama Bin Laden, in training with the Pakistan Army, 1981.Photo originally scanned from the New York Village Voice. Photo credited to the Sygma/Corbis Agency, Paris.Osama Bin Laden CIA agentIn mid-1979, about the same time as the Soviet Union deployed troops into Afghanistan, the United States began giving several hundred million dollars a year in aid to the Afghan Mujahideen insurgents. The most famous of the Afghan Arabs was Bin Laden. As the war neared its end, bin Laden organized Al-Qeada. Bin Laden received security training from the CIA itself. It is difficult to believe that the United States played no role in the operations of the son of one of the wealthiest men in Saudi Arabia. Indeed, it is much more likely that the United States knew full-well of bin Laden's operation and gave it all the support they could. An article in Der Spiegel, in 2007, entitled "Arming the Middle East", Siegesmund von Ilsemann called Bin Laden "one of the CIA's best weapons customers." "Death" of Osama bin LadenNow, at the top of FBI's most wanted list, bin Laden was allegedly killed on May 2, 2011 in Bilal Town, Abbottabad, Pakistan in a raid by U.S. special operations forces. Pakistani officials denied harboring or supporting bin Laden, saying that they had no knowledge that he was there. The official mission code name was Operation Neptune Spear, with Jackpot as the code name for bin Laden as an individual and Geronimo as the code word for bin Laden's capture or death. (Geronimo was the Native American leader of the Chiricahua Apache who defied the U.S. government and eluded capture.) After the raid, U.S. forces took bin Laden's body to Afghanistan for identification, then dumped it somewhere at sea within 24 hours of his death. Al Qaeda confirmed the death on May 6 with posts made on jihadist websites, vowing to avenge the killing. There is an outcry from some groups for the photo evidence of the death. White House said the photograph of a dead Osama bin Laden is "gruesome" and that "it could be inflammatory" if released. The only released image so far, apparently showing a dead Osama bin Laden broadcast on Pakistani television and picked up by British newspaper websites is a fake. The bloodied image of a man with matted hair and a blank, half-opened eye has been circulating on the internet for the past two years. It was used on the front pages of the Mail, Times, Telegraph, Sun and Mirror websites, though swiftly removed after the fake was exposed on Twitter. Obama has shown irritation that the focus is more on the photo than the fact that Osama was killed. The statements released state that the Osama is in fact dead, and was proven with DNA evidence (The White House claims there was a DNA match between the body and tissue taken from bin Laden’s dead sister’s brain). In a propaganda piece reeking of US Triumphalism, two alleged journalists, Adam Goldman and Chris Brummitt, of the Associated Press or, rather, of the White House Ministry of Truth, write, or copy off a White House or CIA press release that “Osama bin Laden, the terror mastermind killed by Navy SEALs in an intense firefight, was hunted down based on information first gleaned years ago (emphasis added) from detainees at secret CIA prison sites in Eastern Europe. How many Americans will notice that the first paragraph of the “report” justifies CIA prisons and torture? Without secret prisons and torture “the terror mastermind” would still be running free, despite having died from renal failure in 2001. Americans are too busy celebrating to think, a capability that seems to have been taken out of their education.Yes, Osama bin Laden is dead... He's been dead for almost ten years. Osama bin Laden has died a peaceful death due to an untreated lung complication, the Pakistan Observer reported (Dec 2001), citing a Taliban leader who allegedly attended the funeral of the Al Qaeda leader. Bin Laden, according to the source, was suffering from a serious lung complication and succumbed to the disease in mid-December 2001, in the vicinity of the Tora Bora mountains. Another source, a former CIA agent, currently living in Turkey , Berkan Yashar, himself an ethnic Chechen, told the Russian TV station, Channel One. “Samy, Ayub and Mahmud (Bin Laden's Chechen bodyguards) were with him right to the end. I remember well this date as there were three sixes in it – June 26, 2006. Those three men, as well as two Muslims from London and two from the US saw Bin Laden dead.He was seriously ill before his death. He faded away to skin and bone. The three Chechens washed his body before burying it.”Yashar also said that on the eve of May 2, when President Obama announced that Bin Laden had been killed, the Americans found only Bin Laden’s grave near the Afghan-Pakistani border and staged an operation. According to Yashar, US special forces started hunting Bin Laden’s Chechen guards after Bin Laden’s death was first announced at a conference in Washington in November 2008. The last of them, Samy, was taken by the American special forces a few days before Bin Laden was officially pronounced dead. Berkan Yashar believes Samy could have told them the exact place of burial.Allegedly, the “most wanted criminal” was not moving from hide-out to hide-out in desolate mountains, but ensconced in luxury quarters in broad daylight. Nevertheless, despite his obvious location, it took the CIA years to find him after claiming to have gained information of his whereabouts out of captives in secret prisons. So the claimed murder of bin Laden by the US in a sovereign foreign country with which the US is not at war, a crime under international law, has set up three more self-serving possibilities: Terrorists will avenge bin Laden’s death, says the CIA, setting up another false flag attack to keep the profits flowing into the military/security complex and the power flowing into the unaccountable CIA. Homeland Security can extend the domestic police state, abuse of travelers, and arrests of war protestors. And Pakistan is under the gun of invasion and takeover (for India, of course) for shielding bin Laden. As the alleged body has been dumped into the ocean, nothing remains but the word of the US government, which lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and Al Qaeda connections, about Iranian nukes, and, according to thousands of experts, about 9/11. Suddenly the government is telling us the truth about bin Laden’s death? Obama needs closure of the Afghan war and occupation in order to deal with the US budget deficit. Subsequent statements from Obama regime officials suggest that the agenda might be to give Americans a piece of war victory in order to boost their lagging enthusiasm. Obama needs some "good news" after terrible failure in Libya. Dead or alive, it doesn't matter, Al-Qaeda lives on. There was no Al-Qeada in Iraq, Bosnia or Kosovo before NATO humanitarian operations.LIBYA: Al-Qaeda and West on the same sideBritish MI6 and the CIA paid Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda $100,000 dollars to assassinate Gaddafi in 1996 (source). Indeed, it was Gaddafi’s Libya who put out the first Interpol warrant for Bin Laden’s arrest in 1998. Western intelligence agencies blocked the warrant from being pursued, and allowed Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to go on and kill more than 200 people in the truck bombings of US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania Statements of support for Libya's revolution this year by Al-Qaeda and leading Islamists have led to fears that military action by the West might be playing into the hands of its ideological enemies. Some of the very rebels now being funded and trained by western forces were part of the Al-Qaeda cell that tried to kill Gaddafi on behalf of the United States and Britain 15 years ago. WikiLeaks cables, independent analysts and reporters have all identified supporters of Islamist causes among the opposition to Col Gaddafi's regime, particularly in the towns of Benghazi and Dernah. Col Gaddafi has pinpointed the rebels in Dernah as being led by an Al-Qaeda cell that has declared the town an Islamic emirate. The regime also casts blame on hundreds of members of the Libyan Islamist Fighting Group released since the group renounced violence two years ago. The man running Dernah's defences, Abdelkarim al-Hasadi, was arrested by US forces in Afghanistan in 2002. Achieving new heights of hypocrisy, the U.S government is hyping the threat of Libyan-backed reprisal terror attacks inside the United States, while launching air strikes in support of so-called “protesters” who have commandeered fighter jets and tanks, and are in fact Islamic fundamentalist Al-Qaeda cells who want to impose sharia law in Libya. The UN-backed air strikes have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with protecting the human rights of “protesters”. This is about giving war a new facelift, leaving the new world order free to pillage any country they like in the name of “humanitarian” assistance. United States, which kills scores of innocent people every week with predator drone strikes, has now suddenly developed a conscience for human suffering. The whole farce mirrors Bill Clinton’s bombing campaigns in Bosnia and Serbia, which were also about helping Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to topple autocratic but relatively moderate regimes, and were also military conquests packaged in the cloak of “humanitarian” deception by the global establishment media. (wanna know more?)Subscribe in a reader

Facebook page
that hit over 22,000.00 fans in just two days (over 66,000.00 on april 5th). Group against aggression on Lybia formed by administrators from Serbia is most visited facebook page on the net at the moment. People got organized via facebook and showed their support in front of TITO memorial center in Belgrade. People of Libya, you are not alone. Serbian media have reported that Serb support for Gadhafi has been welcomed by the Libya's state-run media, while the Libyan opposition has warned that the pro-Gadhafi camp likely enjoys financial backing from nationalist Serb parties. Nothing can be further from the truth. Backers of this facebook group are ordinary everyday internet users that just don't buy another "humanitarian war for peace" lie. Why is that so hard to understand? "There's no such thing as free lunch" is a western saying. In their minds, you have to pay for everything, that's why they think that this support is paid by someone. Nope... this one is for free. Serbian people know fully well what's going on these days in the desert.

video
Subscribe in a reader

Remember this when you turn on your tv "News" channel. Propaganda is a form of communication that is aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position. Propaganda often presents facts selectively (thus possibly lying) to encourage a particular synthesis, or uses loaded messages to produce an emotional rather than rational response to the information presented. The desired result is a change of the attitude toward the subject in the target audience to further a political agenda. Propaganda can be used as a form of political warfare. If you control what people think, you’ve won the war before it has even begun. Since the 1950’s all major news and polling organizations have, to one degree or another, been absorbed into the sphere of control of the intelligence agencies.
The U.S. Department of Defense defines psychological warfare as:
"The planned use of propaganda and other psychological actions having the primary purpose of influencing the opinions, emotions, attitudes, and behavior of hostile foreign groups in such a way as to support the achievement of national objectives."
Probably every conflict is fought on at least two grounds: the battlefield and the minds of the people via propaganda. The “good guys” and the “bad guys” can often both be guilty of misleading their people with distortions, exaggerations, subjectivity, inaccuracy and even fabrications, in order to receive support and a sense of legitimacy. In preparing for or justifying war, additional techniques are often employed:





The Preliminary Stage—during which the country concerned comes to the news, portrayed as a cause for “mounting concern” because of poverty/dictatorship/anarchy;
The Justification Stage—during which big news is produced to lend urgency to the case for armed intervention to bring about a rapid restitution of “normality”;
The Implementation Stage—when pooling and censorship provide control of coverage;





There is always a "dead baby story" and it comes at the key point of the Justification Stage—in the form of a story whose apparent urgency brooks no delay—specifically, no time for cool deliberation or negotiating on peace proposals. Human interest stories … are ideal for engendering this atmosphere. Reference to the "dead baby story" is about the 1991 Gulf War where a U.S. public relations firm got a Kuwaiti Ambassador’s daughter to pose as a nurse claiming she saw Iraqi troops killing babies in hospitals. The purpose of this was to create arousal and demonize Iraq so war was more acceptable. The Guardian also points out four stages in preparing a nation for war:


1. The crisis
The reporting of a crisis which negotiations appear unable to resolve. Politicians, while calling for diplomacy, warn of military retaliation. The media reports this as “We’re on the brink of war”, or “War is inevitable”, etc.
2. The demonisation of the enemy’s leader
Comparing the leader with Hitler is a good start because of the instant images that Hitler’s name provokes.
3. The demonisation of the enemy as individuals
For example, to suggest the enemy is insane.
4. Atrocities
Even making up stories to whip up and strengthen emotional reactions.

Journalists who engage in war propaganda must be held accountable.
/by Thierry Meyssan

The war propaganda has entered a new phase, involving the coordinated action of satellite TV stations. CNN, France24, the BBC and Al Jazeera have become instruments of disinformation used to demonize governments and justify armed aggressions. These practices are illegal under international law and the impunity of the perpetrators must be stopped. We witnessed a situation in 2002 when Globovisión broadcast live images of a popular revolution against elected President Hugo Chávez plus images of pro-Chavez activists gunning down protesters. This staged event had made it possible to mask a military coup orchestrated by Washington with the help of Madrid. However, after a genuine popular uprising aborted the coup and reinstated the elected president, legal and journalistic investigations revealed that the revolution filmed by Globovisión was in fact a case of visual trickery and that the Chavistas had never fired on the crowd, but were themselves the victims of snipers armed by the CIA. We see the same thing happening today, but with a consortium of satellite channels which transmit images of nonexistent events in Libya and Syria. Their aim is to make people believe the majority of Libyans and Syrians want to overthrow their political institutions and that Muammar Gaddafi and Bashar al-Assad have massacred their own people. On the basis of such media intoxication, NATO attacked Libya and is about to destroy Syria. Resolution 110 of 3 November 1947 regarding "measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war," condemns "propaganda which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression. " Words and, especially, images can be used to prepare the worst crimes. In this case, the intoxication by CNN, France24, the BBC and Al Jazeera constitute "crimes against peace." They should be considered as being more serious than the war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by NATO in Libya and by Western intelligence agencies in Syria insofar as they precede and make them possible. Journalists who engage in war propaganda must be tried by International Justice.



War, Propaganda and the Media




"Just doing my job"/ Joseph Goebbels
Subscribe in a reader

Nicolas Sarkozy, David Cameron, Hillary Clinton, representatives of the Arab League and UN chief Ban Ki-moon have met in Paris to discuss military action to help Al-Qaeda in Libya. Although Germany does not want to take part in any military action in Libya there are reports that there is a proposal on the table between Germany and the US. It could result in Germany sending reinforcements to Afghanistan to free up resources for the Libya mission. Nobel Peace Prize winner Barack Obama, didn't want to be the first to spill some Libyan blood unlike Sarkozy who owes Gaddafi some money, so French were the first to invade Libyan air space. Americans made it clear they do not want to lead the "no-fly zone operation" – they will be just participating. The main goal of the operation is to "protect civilians from Gaddafi". We already know how NATO protects civilians. But, there is a catch, not to mention that those "civilians" use jet fighters and tanks. In order to protect "civilians" one must first, get rid of Gaddafi.

Recent history in the Balkans and Iraq shows us that "no-fly zones" are the first step to a full-on ground assault. Those who advocate in favour of intervention assume that the outcome will be a free and liberal-democratic Libya. It is perhaps worth consulting our history books to remember that democracy does not just happen. It is a messy and long process. There is no guarantee that if NATO bombs Libya, democracy will result. What if the outcome of the rebellion against Gaddafi were to be a hardline Islamic government? Creating a no-fly zone at this point would be the first step to escalating the war, not preventing or ending it. If they are going to strike against targets in the cities, that will certainly result in large numbers of civilian casualties. If west intervenes in Libya, why not in Egypt, why not in Bahrain, why not in Ivory Coast? Some big players in Arab League trade their green light for agression on Libya for freedom of dealing with their own opposition. I'll scratch your back if you scratched mine. I wonder if that call for intervention from Arab League would be possible if Mubarack was still in power. Speaking of new democratic Egypt, Egypt's military is supplying arms to Libyan rebels with the US government’s full knowledge. Facing greater pressure from the Libyan army, rebel gangs have been losing ground. Rebellion has been a disaster and Libyan government won. There was no civil war, only bunch of untrained seccesionists. They were about to be defeated.

Tripoli has submitted to the UN Security Council’s demands and declared a ceasefire. Earlier on Thursday, the UN Security Council approved a resolution which allowed military action against Libyan forces as long as it helped stop violence in the country and did not include any ground operations. On Friday, Libyan Foreign Minister Mussa Kussa said that they had decided on an immediate ceasefire, and pledged that the government will do its best to ensure peace and order in the country and protect human rights. Libyan people's army has encircled last rebel strong hold, city of Benghazi. Mujahedeen fighters were about to be destroyed when US and EU decided to help them and turn the tide. Libyan authorities have already asked the governments of Malta, Turkey and China to send their observers to the country so that they keep a watch on the maintenance of peace. Meanwhile, US President Barack Obama said that Gaddafi should withdraw his troops from those cities occupied by the opposition. He also called on the Libyan authorities not to prevent "humanitarian aid deliveries to civilians" (weapon deliveries for rebel forces). Same thing happened in Yugoslavia, back in 1999. Same US administration, same Clintons, same politics. Meanwhile, the rebels say they simply do not need the ceasefire. The clashes in the east and west still continue. One "democratic opposition" fighter jet got shot down by Libyan forces and it was enough to call a ceasefire failed. French have dropped their bombs... War is on. It’s not full-scale war, but the objectives of the Western allies are certainly greater than a no-fly zone. Britain and France have absolutely no interest in the revolution being victorious all the way from the east to Tripoli and on to the west of Libya. They have all the oil they need in eastern Libya. They want to devide the country in two. If Gaddafi steps down that is. They are intervening in order to freeze the presence of revolutionary change at a certain point that is not fundamentally threatening to their interests. Collaborators will fight to the end because they know Gaddafi will have no merci on them. Another shamefull war, another lie. Hypocrisy of the West stinks like hell. Talking about selective interference. What about Bahrain? Islamist Rebellion in Libya is anything but killing innocent civilians. But, peaceful protesters are being killed today... in Bahrain.

Bahrain's security forces have continued their attempts to break the back of the island kingdom's mainly Shia opposition movement with a series of arrests and more attacks on Shia villages outside the capital. The 250,000-barrel-a-day oil refinery operated by Bahrain Petroleum Company has been shut down by the strike, what was unacceptable. Pro-democracy protesters fled in panic, witnesses said, as Saudi forces appeared poised to help the embattled government restore order in the strategic Gulf kingdom, home to the US Fifth Fleet. The Saudi troops entered Shiite-majority Bahrain last Sunday as part of the Gulf countries' joint Peninsula Shield Force, the Saudi official told AFP, requesting anonymity. Saudi Arabia being another democracy of course...

Subscribe in a reader